Healey Tells Labour Conference Cutting Welfare Bill Is a 'Moral Duty' as He Pledges Apprenticeship Expansion
Chancellor John Healey has used his speech at the Labour Party's annual conference in Liverpool to argue that reducing welfare spending is not only an economic necessity but a mora
Chancellor John Healey has used his speech at the Labour Party's annual conference in Liverpool to argue that reducing welfare spending is not only an economic necessity but a moral obligation, warning that allowing Britain's benefits bill to keep growing would betray a generation of young people.
In remarks delivered on Monday, Healey said the country must avoid a situation where benefits expand unchecked while young people are denied genuine opportunities. "The best thing we can offer a young person is not a benefit payment - it's a first job with training and a wage," he told delegates, framing employment as the central route out of poverty and dependency.
The chancellor's address comes at a politically sensitive moment. He is under mounting pressure to either cut public spending or increase taxes ahead of next month's Budget, as the government seeks to bring down its borrowing costs and reassure financial markets about the state of the public finances.
Seeking to project fiscal credibility, Healey insisted that every commitment the government makes would be "built on the rock of fiscal discipline." He said he and Prime Minister Andy Burnham were "united on meeting the fiscal rules" - the self-imposed constraints that govern decisions on spending and taxation.
He also acknowledged the changed economic landscape facing the current government, conceding that "the money New Labour had in the '90s is simply not there now." The remark appeared designed to temper expectations about what the government can afford to deliver, even as it pursues an ambitious agenda on jobs and industry.
Healey placed blame for the strained fiscal position on the Conservatives' period in office, saying the party had left Britain spending more on debt interest than on the Home Office, Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Justice combined. The comparison was intended to underline what he characterised as the inheritance of a damaged economic legacy.
The centrepiece of his conference announcement was a significant expansion of the Local Apprenticeships Service. Initially conceived as a pilot in a limited number of areas, the scheme will now be made available to any English mayor who wishes to take part, a move Healey said would deliver thousands more apprenticeships for young people.
Under the plans, which the Treasury says will roll out across England from March 2027, local teams will match young people with employers, including small businesses that have never previously taken on a trainee. The Department for Work and Pensions is providing an additional £100m for the scheme, which it says is fully funded through savings within the department.
Healey argued that powers to implement the programme should rest with mayors because "they know which firms are hiring, which colleges are delivering, which estates have been left behind." The emphasis on local control reflects a broader devolution agenda, giving regional leaders greater influence over skills and employment policy.
The chancellor described young people as "digital natives, whip-smart, questioning, ambitious, brave," and said the goal was to move them from "generation jeopardy to generation hope." His language sought to strike an optimistic tone while acknowledging the scale of the challenge facing the labour market.
Central to his argument was the figure of roughly one million young people not in education, employment or training - commonly known as Neets. Healey said this created an urgent need to transform benefits into a bridge into work rather than a "trap," adding: "It is not progressive to allow a bigger and bigger benefits bill, and a system which offers an income but doesn't offer a future."
His comments come as the final instalment of a major report by former minister Alan Milburn is expected within weeks, setting out recommendations for tackling the one in eight people aged 16 to 24 in the UK who are Neets. Healey said these young people had too often been "signed off, written off," and that the Labour government was determined to address that failure.
The opposition responded sharply. Tory shadow chancellor Andrew Griffith said "Labour MPs will never support cutting the out-of-control welfare bill," adding that "with Labour, it's always more taxes if you work and more benefits if you don't" - a line intended to frame the government as anti-aspiration.
Outside Westminster, economists questioned whether fiscal rules alone would be sufficient. Helen Miller, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank, told the BBC that adhering to fiscal rules would not by itself reduce debt, describing such a commitment as "basically a promise to get down debt tomorrow." She suggested that reducing the benefits bill, including withdrawing support from some people, could be one route to cutting national debt sooner - a politically contentious proposition.
Beyond welfare and apprenticeships, Healey used the speech to repeat his pledges to re-industrialise the country and revealed that Rolls-Royce would invest a further £300m in its British factories in Derby, Bristol, Glasgow and Rotherham. He also said he would reinstate the Union Learning Fund in England, originally established in 1998 and abolished by the Conservatives, to help working people gain new skills in an era shaped by artificial intelligence. It was initially unclear how that commitment would be funded.
Healey also said the coming Budget would "give families and businesses a bit of breathing space," striking a conciliatory note amid speculation about tax rises and spending restraint. The balancing act reflects the government's twin pressures: supporting households and growth while maintaining the confidence of markets and meeting its own fiscal targets.
Comments (0)