Conservatives Accuse Burnham of Being 'Out of Touch' Over Man City Owner Remarks
Andy Burnham has come under fire from the Conservative Party after he expressed concern about the possibility of Manchester City's owners selling the club following its breach of P
Andy Burnham has come under fire from the Conservative Party after he expressed concern about the possibility of Manchester City's owners selling the club following its breach of Premier League financial rules. The former Greater Manchester mayor's comments were branded "completely out of touch" with supporters and the wider public by Tory officials, escalating a political row over the ongoing football governance scandal.
The controversy stems from an interview Burnham gave to the BBC's political editor, Chris Mason, in which he said he would be "really concerned" if the club's Abu Dhabi-based owners decided to walk away. Manchester City were found guilty by an independent commission of the majority of the 115 charges brought against them, a verdict that has sent shockwaves through English football and raised profound questions about the integrity of the sport's regulatory framework.
Among the most damning findings from the independent panel was that City had arranged "sham contracts" with a number of commercial partners. These arrangements were part of what investigators described as a scheme designed to disguise secret funding exceeding £830 million. The Premier League stated that the club had "systematically broke Premier League Rules for nearly a decade", a conclusion that carries significant weight given its sweeping language and the length of time involved.
Burnham, who served as mayor of Greater Manchester until June, attempted to tread a careful line during his BBC interview. He insisted he was "not getting directly involved in the process" and that the matter "has to be a process undertaken independently by the Premier League". He also noted that the situation was "contested by Manchester City" and argued it would be "wrong" to "jump to a conclusion" before all proceedings had concluded.
However, the former mayor did not shy away from expressing his personal feelings about the club's ownership group, which has been led by Sheikh Mansour, a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family and the United Arab Emirates' deputy prime minister, since 2008. "I would be really concerned to lose them," Burnham said, describing the owners as having been "such a huge partner in the building of modern Manchester and obviously the building of Manchester City into the global force that it is". He added that he could not intervene further in the process, acknowledging that doing so "would be wrong".
The comments drew a sharp response from Louie French, the shadow minister for sport, who issued a statement on Thursday calling on the government to "keep politics out of football and ensure the Premier League's independent commission can do its job free of outside influence". French's intervention signals that the opposition intends to make political capital out of the affair, framing Burnham's remarks as an inappropriate attempt to shield powerful owners from accountability.
French went further, highlighting the gravity of the allegations facing the club and the emotional toll on supporters. "The club face unprecedented allegations and fans are horrified by what they are reading in the papers," the Tory MP said. "Yet Burnham is publicly backing the owners even as the investigation continues. Fans will rightly ask whether political pressure is being applied here and how it relates to the owners' well-reported investments in Manchester."
The shadow minister concluded by emphasising the principle of equal treatment under the rules. "Football must be governed independently, with the rules applying equally to everyone. Fans deserve confidence that no club or owner is above those rules," he stated. Downing Street has been contacted for comment, though no response had been issued at the time of reporting.
Manchester City have until Friday to submit an appeal against the commission's findings. The club has consistently denied any wrongdoing and issued a statement saying they were "both disappointed and surprised by the opinion of the Premier League Commission", while maintaining their innocence of all accusations made against them. The prospect of an appeal leaves both the club and the Premier League in a state of considerable uncertainty, with the final outcome potentially taking months or even years to resolve.
The independent panel that found City guilty of rule breaches will now convene a sanctions hearing to determine the appropriate punishment. That hearing could take months to arrange, and the range of possible penalties is wide, encompassing a substantial fine, a points deduction, or even more severe measures. Burnham himself compared City's situation to that of Everton, the club he supports, which was charged with a more minor breach of Premier League financial rules in 2023. He stated that he "hold[s] the view very firmly that they weren't fairly treated in that process".
During his interview, Burnham also said he was "of course" confident that his own interactions with City's owners during his time as Greater Manchester mayor would withstand scrutiny. That assertion may face testing as the fallout from the case continues to unfold and questions about the relationship between political figures and football club owners intensify.
The case has also attracted the attention of the Independent Football Regulator, a body established by the government in 2025. Its chairman, David Kogan, said the matter had raised "serious issues". In a statement, he noted that the IFR "has powers to assess the suitability of owners, directors and executives and we will use these powers where appropriate", while also "taking account of the findings made by the Leagues". He added that proceedings remain ongoing and expressed hope for a swift resolution.
The widespread shock within football about the scale of the commission's findings has been matched by surprise at the strength of the Premier League's language regarding City's conduct. The case has raised fundamental questions about how top-flight English football is governed, whether financial rules can be enforced effectively against wealthy owners, and what role politicians should play when major clubs face serious allegations. With City's appeal deadline looming and the sanctions process yet to begin, the controversy appears far from reaching a conclusion.
Comments (0)